Back in September, Globe and Mail columnist, Gary Mason predicted that the American funding of Canadian environmental groups would become one of the discussion points in the debate over the Northern Gateway Enbridge pipeline. Well, that's exactly what seems to be happening. (See: The next great pipeline debate - and American funding).
In an interview with Global TV in Vancouver, Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper was asked about opposition to the Northern Gateway pipeline. This new pipeline would allow Canada to export Alberta oil to Asia, via a port at Kitimat. One of the trade consequences of opening the Northern Gateway would be that the U.S. would lose its monopoly on Canadian oil exports.
Here's what Prime Minister Stephen Harper told Global TV:
Prime Minister Stephen Harper: There are environmentalists who will oppose any of these projects. Obviously, there will be environmental assessments and there always have to be negotiations with First Nations but that all said, this is a critical and important project to Canada as a whole.
Global TV: Canadian opposition may not be the only stumbling block.
Prime Minister Stephen Harper: I think we'll see significant American interests trying to line up against the Northern Gateway project, precisely because its not in the interests of the United States. Its in the interests of Canada.
Global TV: Could they do anything to stop it?
Prime Minister Harper: Well, they'll funnel money through environmental groups and others in order to try to slow it down but, as I say, we'll make sure that the best interests of Canada are protected.
Glad to hear it said.
Nice to see that all your hard work has reached into the PM office.
Posted by: Leavittj | 11/29/2011 at 09:22 AM
Congrats Vivian!
@ymmbruce
Posted by: Bruce Anderson | 11/29/2011 at 07:32 PM
Sounds like Harper has already made up his mind for all of us. Why even bother with a joint review panel?
Posted by: Kyla | 12/06/2011 at 10:02 PM
Today, January 9, Stephen Harper and Joe Oliver stated in the media that there was a radical environmental ideology behind the opposition to the Enbridge project. Harper and Oliver are right when they state that there is a well-defined ideology behind environmentalists trying to stop the Enbridge project. That ideology is found in the field of environmental ethics. Google “Deep Ecology”, “ecocentrism” and “Ecojustice” to find what that ideology is.
As part of its entry on Ecojustice, The Encyclopedia of Ethics by Becker had this to say:
“Ecocentric environmental ethics, ecojustice theorists claim, will remain a mere academic pastime unless it unites with an equally new and revolutionary economic and political theory that offers an alternative to the prevailing identification of development with industrialization, freedom with unrestrained consumption, and democracy with corporate oligarchy.”
Sound familiar in the context of various environmental campaigns?
Posted by: RK in Coquitlam | 01/09/2012 at 08:14 PM
Keep up the good work. You've made considerable progress !!
Posted by: Heather Olney | 01/12/2012 at 07:44 AM